For many schools, new testing (PARCC, Smarter Balanced, or
other tests) is already underway. For mine in New Jersey, PARCC looms just over
the horizon, and my colleagues are worried. We have been scrambling to do
everything we can to prepare them in this final stretch before the first round
of assessments and will continue to do so in the short weeks leading up to the
end-of-year tests.
As instructional coach for humanities and English lead
teacher, I have spent significant parts of each day over the last few weeks
trying to calm both my colleagues and our students. Yes, the PARCC will be
challenging, but we’re doing the right things to prepare. The initial results
will likely be disheartening, but we don’t know what “passing” is yet, and it’s
just a place to start.
Though we’ve been teaching with the assessments in mind for
more than a year, a few things have come into sharper focus in these last few
weeks:
It’s critical to help
students find solid footing on the writing prompts.
What this means: Make it clear to students that, no matter
what texts they are dealing with, the literary and research simulation writing
tasks simply ask them to demonstrate that they understand and can articulate
the similarities and differences between the texts. If they can do that at
least to some degree in an organized way, they’ll be in good shape.
Let’s not kid ourselves: With complex texts, this can be a
daunting task, but teaching students to use strategies like SOAP (speaker,
occasion, audience, purpose) and to pay attention to textual features (titles,
subheads, etc.) can help them get some kind of handle on most texts.
It’s critical to talk to your content area colleagues to identify essential understandings.
Based on its own claims and the sample test items it has
released, it’s clear that PARCC will feature relevant reading passages on the
tests, rather than the often very obscure and esoteric texts students have
often faced in the past. However, I have also observed that even these
relatively interesting and relevant texts require significant background
knowledge to access them fully.
For example, based on the PARCC practice tests, I would bet
money that the PARCC research simulation tasks for multiple grades will include excerpts from
Supreme Court decisions. With this thinking I shared an excerpt of the 1920
Supreme Court decision on prohibition with my sophomores, in conjunction with
our study of The Great Gatsby. Before
doing so, I forwarded the excerpt, which I had edited and annotated with
discussion questions, highlighting key vocabulary, concepts and text features,
to my students’ social studies teachers to see if they might have an
opportunity to connect with or simply reinforce the concepts and/or content we
would be discussing. I ended up having a very useful conversation with one of
them who shared the essential framework that he teaches students to use in
interpreting a Supreme Court decision. He reminded me that students first need
to understand the role of the Supreme Court, which is to determine
constitutionality rather than guilt or innocence. (We can’t assume that
students will know this.) Then, they need to understand that a Supreme Court
decision is always answering a question (e.g., is prohibition constitutional?).
I realized that these two understandings are essential to my students having
success with the decision we would be discussing and any that might be thrown
at them on the PARCC assessments.
It’s critical to give
students ample practice on the test format.
Run through each of the available practice tests for the grade level
below your class to give your students explicit practice in manipulating the online
testing interface before having them do a “real” practice test that you might
grade or at least score. The drag-and-drop test items are particularly tricky. You
don’t want your students’ success on the tests to be diminished by technical
issues. And even though you have likely asked them the same types of questions
in your classes, students, as we well know, often fail to recognize that they
do understand a question just because it’s presented in an unfamiliar way.
That said, it’s
critical to tie this work back to your existing curriculum.
Don’t spend all your time between now and testing on
practice tests. The skills the assessments are asking your students to
demonstrate are important. Students should be reading critically and using
evidence to support their thinking and writing about the texts they read, and
the texts they read should be challenging. But the time you devote to test
preparation – mandated by your school/district and/or your own
conscience/anxiety – doesn’t have to and shouldn’t happen solely with materials
developed by PARCC or Pearson – for a number of reasons.
I had a conversation with one of our English teachers who
was frustrated that her students didn’t seem to be taking the practice tests
seriously. After mulling over how the students were acting and various
strategies we could try, we realized what was shutting them down. It was too
much. They were struggling not only with the readings (including the syntax,
the vocabulary, and the background knowledge needed to access them), but with
the wording of the questions themselves as well. We decided to backtrack.
Rather than forcing the students to deal with new complex texts and challenging
questions on top of operating the unfamiliar testing interface, we decided to
return to articles they’d read previously and give them practice on PARCC-style
questions on those first, so they can get a clear handle on the task (see above)
before returning to the more challenging, unfamiliar texts on the practice
tests.
Whether your students are struggling with the practice tests
or soaring above them, there’s no need to abandon your curriculum in favor of
test prep. They are not mutually exclusive. Whatever great works you’re studying, tweak the materials you’re using (or find new ones) to give your
students more or less explicit practice on the types of questions they’ll see
on the new assessments. That way, you can get back to the rich content in your
curriculum while knowing that you’re preparing your students for success in the
best way possible, by having them read, think, and write deeply about works
worth reading, thinking, and writing deeply about.
No comments:
Post a Comment